The verdict is in. The California Supreme Court has ruled and the voter’s voice on marriage has been preserved, at least, for the moment. I must confess, though, that while I’m relieved, I’m a bit fatigued. Watching Miss USA contender Carrie Prejean assaulted for stating her views on marriage has been brutal. Hearing actor Sean Penn admonish supporters of the California law, Proposition 8, at this year’s Academy Awards ceremony to “sit and reflect and anticipate their great shame and the shame in their grandchildren’s eyes” was ugly. Reading about how Proposition 8 opponents were circulating Google maps detailing the locations of Proposition 8 supporters’ homes to harass them was insidious.
I’m sure I’m not alone. Many Christians may be hesitant, if not completely resistant, to engage the culture on issues that contradict their values and beliefs the next time around. But we must ask ourselves – as the church, what should our response be? The answer for me comes in looking back at how the early church responded to similar opposition. They were committed to stand for what they knew to be truth, even if it meant the ultimate sacrifice. Many were sent to their death in the jaws of wild beasts in front of a coliseum of eager spectators. Today rather than facing the lions, the church now faces the merciless jaws of litigation. Instead of an audience of robed spectators, there is now a virtual coliseum of media correspondents, magazines and talk shows ready to voice their particular perspective on the events. The attitude against the church is the same but the venue for persecution has been modernized. As a result many churches have gone underground on this issue of homosexuality and are fearful to engage the topic at any level. Some believe there is too much to risk and besides; gay marriage will eventually be federally legalized so why fight it?
But wait a minute. Who is the real victim in this scenario? Is it really the church?
Click here for entire article in Charisma Magazine
I realize that recently I’ve made a few posts about the recent developments regarding Ted Haggard. This isn’t to elevate one particular situation or give it undue and unnecessary attention. As with any situation involving a previously or presently influential leader, the way they respond has the potential to define or distort crucial issues that face the church today. Ted Haggard’s fall continues to impact and influence not only those within the church but our current cultural climate today.
On Thursday, Ted & Gayle Haggard made their anticipated appearance on Oprah. I watched and processed with mixed emotions. I was planning write my viewpoints on the interview until someone sent me an excellent overview by Joe Dallas (one of my favorite speakers and teachers). I don’t want to reinvent the wheel so here is what Joe had so say:
Ted Said: AfterThoughts on Ted Haggard’s Interview with Oprah
Guest Post by Joe Dallas
Rev. Ted Haggard broke his two year silence on Oprah’s show yesterday, his first media appearance since a catastrophic fall from the pulpit of New Life Church in 2006, when his longstanding relationship with a male prostitute was exposed. The details are still fresh: Haggard, president of the National Association of Evangelicals, was condemning gay sex publicly while paying for it privately, until accusations from male escort Mike Jones cracked the dam of Ted’s denials (“I neverhad gay sex!”) and trickles of half-concessions leaked out (“Well, yeah, I bought some meth from a gay escort, but threw it away”) followed by voice mail recordings irrefutable as Monica’s blue dress, and the inevitable confession, contrition and exit. It was as tawdry as it was achingly familiar in this era of public falls, and many of us hoped the story was played out.
Enter the sequel. An HBO special titled The Trials of Ted Haggard premieres Thursday January 29, and by way of promotion, Ted granted interviews to Larry King as well as Oprah, revisiting those dark days with his own insights and explanations. If there’s a redemptive twist to all this, it lies in what can be gleaned from the Reverend’s experience and, to an extent, his statements about Christianity, homosexuality, church life and human nature. A typical spectator, I cheered and booed throughout the Oprah interview, shouting criticisms or praise while knowing nothing of what it was like for the man under the bright lights being grilled about his worst failures and private agonies. So I’ll concede, a la Roosevelt’s famous observation about the man in the arena, that it is indeed the guy in the ring whose performance matters far and above the critic who wishes he’d done this or said that.
From that deferential position, then, let me offer some thoughts on what Ted said, what I wish he’d said, and what still needs to be said:
Ted said: “I’m a heterosexual with homosexual attachments.”
What prompted it: Oprah’s predictable but relevant question: Are you gay, straight, or bisexual? (read more)
On Tuesday, after much controversy, Rick Warren gave his invocation for President Obama’s inauguration (for a transcipt of the prayer, click here). I thought he did an excellent job and delivered it with uncompromised conviction. (I thought the four different references to the name of Jesus was brilliant.) However, it seems that everyone wasn’t pleased. There were complaints that he used Jesus’ name and closed with the Lord’s Prayer. A professor of American religious history at Columbia University who claims to be a friend of Warren says “To lead the nation in saying the Lord’s Prayer, which is so particularly Christian was a mistake.” (click here for reference)
Huh?
You’ve got to be kidding.
I understand being sensitive and diplomatic in order to respect others from different cultures, religions, and points of view. I just find it interesting that all religious and socio-political expressions outside of a biblical worldview seem to come under a special protected class in our culture and find safe harbor in the name of diversity. But when a biblical world-view is presented, it is considered intolerant, prejudiced, and antiquated. It seems that when it comes to Christianity, everyone wants to use the mute button. This is a battle I’m afraid so many are all too familiar with.
So I wonder what would have been acceptable for this event. I know it’s a little campy, but maybe something like this would have been more palatable:
“Our existential one whom we acknowledge as a higher power,
Politically correct be your name,
Your rule at bay,
Our will be done,
On earth, as it is in our personal concept of heaven
Give us this day what we desire,
And forgive those who sin against us
By imposing the oppressive notion of sin
And lead us into opportunities for the gratification of our proclivities and passionate indulgences
For this is our kingdom, power, and glory. Amen.”
I think I may try this one out on Sunday morning. I’ll let you know how it goes.
This is a commentary I wrote for Ministry Today, January 20, 2009.
Ted Haggard is using an upcoming HBO documentary to chastise the church for how it handled his sex-and-drugs scandal in 2006. Read one pastor’s take on why he may have a point.
Ted Haggard is at it again. The former pastor of a Colorado mega church who admitted to a sexual relationship with a male escort in 2006, is now sharing his story in a documentary called The Trials of Ted Haggard. On January 29, the film premieres on HBO and will re-examine the scandal that rocked the evangelical world. For many, this film will reopen old wounds and stir up feelings thought to be dead and buried.
I question why Haggard chose this particular outlet to voice the pain and frustration of his private journey. While I can only imagine the suffering Haggard has endured over the past two years, I cannot excuse some of his choices. And now, once again, it seems the church will have to deal with another reminder of those choices. But maybe there are some things worth being reminded of.
In recent news reports, Ted Haggard chastised church leaders for missing an opportunity to use his scandal to “communicate the gospel worldwide.” Despite how we may feel about the circumstances surrounding Haggard, I believe we have the responsibility to ask: Is he right? Did we, the global Christian church, somehow miss an opportunity to respond to those who struggle with unwanted same-sex attraction with the gospel of truth? While these are valid questions that demand our attention, I believe there is another question that addresses an issue just as important, if not far greater:
What if Ted had told the truth? (click here for the entire article)
Yesterday at the inaugural welcoming ceremony, Bishop V. Gene Robison offered an invocation for the nation and the president-elect. The openly-gay bishop is the subject of much controversy and has come to serve as a representative for the inclusion of gay clergy within the church. In his inaugurate prayer, Robison prays the following:
“Bless us with anger – at discrimination, at home and abroad, against refugees and immigrants, women, people of color, gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people.”
“Bless us with freedom from mere tolerance – replacing it with a genuine respect and warm embrace of our differences, and an understanding that in our diversity, we are stronger.”
While there are other issues that I have in his complete prayer (to read Robinson’s entire prayer click here), these two points are the ones that challenge me the most. For clarity, I will begin by stating that I do not agree with Robison nor do I support the principles and theology he stands for. I believe that he is misleading so many who are desperately trying to reconcile their faith with their same-sex attractions and he will be held accountable for his actions. The theology and philosophies he promotes is one of the most critical frontline issues that the church faces today.
His prayer for tolerance confirms what we’ve known to be true all along. It is not tolerance that is being asked for, but unfettered acceptance. Of course, I can and will extend the respect that any creation of God should receive. This is necessary as a mature believer. However, to ask that I “warmly embrace” a teaching and belief that so counters the truth is unacceptable. I’m afraid we will not be united on that front so I won’t belabor this point.
But this is what I find most interesting: “Bless us with anger.”
Really?
While I do not desire to see anyone treated with disrespect, I will not ask the Lord to “bless me with anger.” I ask that He will guide me and give me discernment and wisdom in the midst of righteous indignation. (If I am pursuing God’s will and what pleases Him, I won’t need to ask for righteous anger, it will come naturally.) I will ask for guidance and compassion when I see a gay-identified person (or anyone else) treated with contempt and disrespect. And, I will also ask for guidance and compassion when I see religious liberties attacked and compromised under the category and agenda of gay rights.
If Gene Robison truly means what he says in his prayer, then I ask how that anger will be received when it finds its expression through those who, based on religious conviction, have been discriminated against and denied their religious freedom.
In the Sermon on the Mount, Christ gives us several scenarios in which we can be “blessed.” Too often, we perceive blessings as those things which make us happy. We cannot pray; “Bless us with these things so that, in the end, we will get what we want and be justified in what we believe to be truth.” In the Beatitudes, “blessed” does not mean ‘happy’ but rather it describes a state that is achieved when we embrace the responsibilities, qualities, and character of being a citizen of God’s Kingdom. We will be in a state of being “blessed” when we walk in humility before God and each other; when we passionately pursue righteousness on every level; when we are utterly sincere in our thoughts and motives towards God and there are no idols that contend against Him (pure in heart); and when we constantly acknowledge our spiritual poverty and are dependent only on Him and upon nothing else that we believe will bring us satisfaction and happiness. We will be “blessed” when we pursue the agenda of God’s Kingdom and no other.
So, I’m afraid that I cannot join Robison in his prayer for anger and discomfort.
I’m still working on that overdue character-study that Jesus assigned a long time ago.
Next Page »
Guest Post by Joe Dallas